The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Development of a clinical polygenic risk score assay and reporting workflow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-022-01767-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Limin Hao, Peter Kraft, Gabriel F. Berriz, Elizabeth D. Hynes, Christopher Koch, Prathik Korategere V Kumar, Shruti S. Parpattedar, Marcie Steeves, Wanfeng Yu, Ashley A. Antwi, Charles A. Brunette, Morgan Danowski, Manish K. Gala, Robert C. Green, Natalie E. Jones, Anna C. F. Lewis, Steven A. Lubitz, Pradeep Natarajan, Jason L. Vassy, Matthew S. Lebo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 12% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 57% |
| Scientists | 41 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#177,162
of 26,567,854 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#777
of 9,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,316
of 454,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#28
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,567,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 109.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.