The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Synthetic regulatory reconstitution reveals principles of mammalian Hox cluster regulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abk2820 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sudarshan Pinglay, Milica Bulajić, Dylan P Rahe, Emily Huang, Ran Brosh, Nicholas E Mamrak, Benjamin R King, Sergei German, John A Cadley, Lila Rieber, Nicole Easo, Timothée Lionnet, Shaun Mahony, Matthew T Maurano, Liam J Holt, Esteban O Mazzoni, Jef D Boeke |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 19% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 61 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 54 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Professor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#157,919
of 26,595,536 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,724
of 84,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,720
of 446,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#108
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,595,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.