The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Standardised data on initiatives—STARDIT: Beta version
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-022-00363-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jack S. Nunn, Thomas Shafee, Steven Chang, Richard Stephens, Jim Elliott, Sandy Oliver, Denny John, Maureen Smith, Neil Orr, Jennifer Preston, Josephine Borthwick, Thijs van Vlijmen, James Ansell, Francois Houyez, Maria Sharmila Alina de Sousa, Roan D. Plotz, Jessica L. Oliver, Yaela Golumbic, Rona Macniven, Samuel Wines, Ann Borda, Håkon da Silva Hyldmo, Pen-Yuan Hsing, Lena Denis, Carolyn Thompson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 14 | 22% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 35 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 71% |
| Scientists | 10 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2024.
All research outputs
#866,361
of 26,619,752 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#43
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,031
of 442,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,619,752 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.