↓ Skip to main content

Repetition and Emotive Communication in Music Versus Speech

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repetition and Emotive Communication in Music Versus Speech
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis

Abstract

Music and speech are often placed alongside one another as comparative cases. Their relative overlaps and disassociations have been well explored (e.g., Patel, 2008). But one key attribute distinguishing these two domains has often been overlooked: the greater preponderance of repetition in music in comparison to speech. Recent fMRI studies have shown that familiarity - achieved through repetition - is a critical component of emotional engagement with music (Pereira et al., 2011). If repetition is fundamental to emotional responses to music, and repetition is a key distinguisher between the domains of music and speech, then close examination of the phenomenon of repetition might help clarify the ways that music elicits emotion differently than speech.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
France 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 87 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 19%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Professor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 34%
Arts and Humanities 11 11%
Neuroscience 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#734,622
of 26,385,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,550
of 35,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,200
of 292,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#75
of 966 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 966 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.