The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: An individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0273526 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leon Di Stefano, Elizabeth L. Ogburn, Malathi Ram, Daniel O. Scharfstein, Tianjing Li, Preeti Khanal, Sheriza N. Baksh, Nichol McBee, Joshua Gruber, Marianne R. Gildea, Megan R. Clark, Neil A. Goldenberg, Yussef Bennani, Samuel M. Brown, Whitney R. Buckel, Meredith E. Clement, Mark J. Mulligan, Jane A. O’Halloran, Adriana M. Rauseo, Wesley H. Self, Matthew W. Semler, Todd Seto, Jason E. Stout, Robert J. Ulrich, Jennifer Victory, Barbara E. Bierer, Daniel F. Hanley, Daniel Freilich, on behalf of the Pandemic Response COVID-19 Research Collaboration Platform for HCQ/CQ Pooled Analyses |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 6 | 14% |
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 24 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Librarian | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,384,453
of 26,800,077 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,912
of 234,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,756
of 445,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#272
of 5,304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,800,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.