↓ Skip to main content

Humanizing glycosylation pathways in eukaryotic expression systems

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,887)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
7 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Humanizing glycosylation pathways in eukaryotic expression systems
Published in
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11274-016-2172-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amjad Hayat Khan, Hadi Bayat, Masoumeh Rajabibazl, Suriana Sabri, Azam Rahimpour

Abstract

Glycosylation represents the most widespread posttranslational modifications, found in a broad spectrum of natural and therapeutic recombinant proteins. It highly affects bioactivity, site-specificity, stability, solubility, immunogenicity, and serum half-life of glycoproteins. Numerous expression hosts including yeasts, insect cells, transgenic plants, and mammalian cells have been explored for synthesizing therapeutic glycoproteins. However, glycosylation profile of eukaryotic expression systems differs from human. Glycosylation strategies have been proposed for humanizing the glycosylation pathways in expression hosts which is the main theme of this review. Besides, we also highlighted the glycosylation potential of protozoan parasites by emphasizing on the mammalian-like glycosylation potential of Leishmania tarentolae known as Leishmania expression system.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 28%
Chemical Engineering 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,665,138
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#28
of 1,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,970
of 316,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,887 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.