↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with inadequate prenatal care service utilization in Ethiopia according to the WHO recommended standard guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with inadequate prenatal care service utilization in Ethiopia according to the WHO recommended standard guidelines
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.998055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berhanu Teshome Woldeamanuel

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Unspecified 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Unspecified 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,842,834
of 24,877,869 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,063
of 13,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,770
of 434,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#356
of 1,511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,877,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.