The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The road to recovery: a synthesis of outcomes from ecosystem restoration in tropical and sub-tropical Asian forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2021.0090 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsay F. Banin, Elizabeth H. Raine, Lucy M. Rowland, Robin L. Chazdon, Stuart W. Smith, Nur Estya Binte Rahman, Adam Butler, Christopher Philipson, Grahame G. Applegate, E. Petter Axelsson, Sugeng Budiharta, Siew Chin Chua, Mark E. J. Cutler, Stephen Elliott, Elva Gemita, Elia Godoong, Laura L. B. Graham, Robin M. Hayward, Andy Hector, Ulrik Ilstedt, Joel Jensen, Srinivasan Kasinathan, Christopher J. Kettle, Daniel Lussetti, Benjapan Manohan, Colin Maycock, Kang Min Ngo, Michael J. O'Brien, Anand M. Osuri, Glen Reynolds, Yap Sauwai, Stefan Scheu, Mangarah Silalahi, Eleanor M. Slade, Tom Swinfield, David A. Wardle, Charlotte Wheeler, Kok Loong Yeong, David F. R. P. Burslem |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 23% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Singapore | 4 | 8% |
| Thailand | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 73% |
| Scientists | 10 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 62 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 25 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 67 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1542. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,069
of 26,798,288 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#5
of 7,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226
of 440,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,798,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.