Title |
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010216.pub7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jamie Hartmann-Boyce<sup>a</sup>, Nicola Lindson<sup>a</sup>, Ailsa R Butler, Hayden McRobbie, Chris Bullen, Rachna Begh, Annika Theodoulou, Caitlin Notley, Nancy A Rigotti, Tari Turner, Thomas R Fanshawe, Peter Hajek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 742 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 72 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 41 | 6% |
Mexico | 36 | 5% |
Australia | 19 | 3% |
France | 14 | 2% |
Germany | 13 | 2% |
Canada | 13 | 2% |
Spain | 10 | 1% |
Argentina | 9 | 1% |
Other | 66 | 9% |
Unknown | 449 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 633 | 85% |
Scientists | 50 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 2% |
Unknown | 7 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
Researcher | 12 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Other | 26 | 13% |
Unknown | 114 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
Psychology | 9 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 8% |
Unknown | 114 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1592. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,370
of 26,213,251 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220
of 502,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,251 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.