↓ Skip to main content

Hitting time for random walks on the Sierpinski network and the half Sierpinski network

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physics, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hitting time for random walks on the Sierpinski network and the half Sierpinski network
Published in
Frontiers in Physics, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphy.2022.1076276
Authors

Yu Sun, Xiaobei Liu, Xiaoyan Li

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#18,951,048
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physics
#1,065
of 3,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,947
of 444,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physics
#52
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,794 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.