↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Determinants of Regulatory T Cell Development: The Essential Roles of Epigenetic Changes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Determinants of Regulatory T Cell Development: The Essential Roles of Epigenetic Changes
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yohko Kitagawa, Naganari Ohkura, Shimon Sakaguchi

Abstract

Regulatory T (Treg) cells constitute a distinct T cell subset, which plays a key role in immune tolerance and homeostasis. The transcription factor Foxp3 controls a substantial part of Treg cell development and function. Yet its expression alone is insufficient for conferring developmental and functional characteristics of Treg cells. There is accumulating evidence that concurrent induction of Treg-specific epigenetic changes and Foxp3 expression is crucial for lineage specification and functional stability of Treg cells. This review discusses recent progress in our understanding of molecular features of Treg cells, in particular, the molecular basis of how a population of developing T cells is driven to the Treg cell lineage and how its function is stably maintained.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 149 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 25%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 18 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,205,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,110
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,132
of 289,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#85
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.