You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
A Multi-agent Planning Approach for the Generation of Personalized Treatment Plans of Comorbid Patients
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 4 |
Book title |
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-38326-7_4 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-238325-0, 978-3-64-238326-7
|
Authors |
Inmaculada Sánchez-Garzón, Juan Fdez-Olivares, Eva OnaindÃa, Gonzalo Milla, Jaume Jordán, Pablo Castejón, Inmaculada Sánchez-Garzón, Eva Onaindía, Jaume Jordán, Pablo Castejón, Sánchez-Garzón, Inmaculada, Fdez-Olivares, Juan, Onaindía, Eva, Milla, Gonzalo, Jordán, Jaume, Castejón, Pablo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Poland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 18% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 17 | 61% |
Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,270,698
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,645
of 8,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,172
of 195,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#46
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.