The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Opioid use and opioid use disorder in mono and dual-system users of veteran affairs medical centers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1148189 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph Goulet, Yan Cheng, William Becker, Cynthia Brandt, Friedhelm Sandbrink, Terri Elizabeth Workman, Phillip Ma, Alexander Libin, Nawar Shara, Christopher Spevak, Joel Kupersmith, Qing Zeng-Treitler |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,451,074
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,056
of 11,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,938
of 336,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#104
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.