The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exogenous L-lactate administration in rat hippocampus increases expression of key regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis and antioxidant defense
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1117146 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mastura Akter, Haiying Ma, Mahadi Hasan, Anwarul Karim, Xiaowei Zhu, Liang Zhang, Ying Li |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 36% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 18% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#19,000,862
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,367
of 3,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,109
of 350,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#56
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.