The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An Improved Peer-Review System to Compensate for Scientific Misconduct in Health-Sensitive Topics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Public Health Reviews, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/phrs.2023.1605601 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alessandro Rovetta, Rossana Garavaglia, Alessandro Vitale, Ettore Meccia, Behailu Terefe Tesfaye, Paolo Mezzana, Vincenzo Accurso |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 67% |
Professor | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 33% |
Linguistics | 1 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,304,850
of 26,450,612 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#174
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,762
of 399,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,450,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.