| Title |
Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-023-40899-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Kozicka, Petr Havlík, Hugo Valin, Eva Wollenberg, Andre Deppermann, David Leclère, Pekka Lauri, Rebekah Moses, Esther Boere, Stefan Frank, Chris Davis, Esther Park, Noel Gurwick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 822 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 97 | 12% |
| United States | 24 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 2% |
| Germany | 17 | 2% |
| Spain | 17 | 2% |
| Canada | 10 | 1% |
| Belgium | 8 | <1% |
| Finland | 7 | <1% |
| Italy | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 4% |
| Unknown | 587 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 744 | 91% |
| Scientists | 50 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 64 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1649. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,882
of 26,192,167 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#135
of 60,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179
of 359,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#7
of 2,222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,192,167 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.