↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the typology of decision-makers, institutions, and incentives that shape health decisions in Pakistan and insulate decision makers from citizens feedback

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the typology of decision-makers, institutions, and incentives that shape health decisions in Pakistan and insulate decision makers from citizens feedback
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1253798
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adnan A. Khan, Romesa Khan, Zainab Khawaja, Muhammad Ibrahim, Zarnab Shaheen, Ayesha Khan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#14,655,357
of 24,974,461 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,830
of 13,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,814
of 182,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#51
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,974,461 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.