The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wood anatomy of Salix x rubens Schrank used for basketry in Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Hoehnea, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1590/s2236-89062009000100003 |
Authors |
Mariana de Andrade Wagner, Maria Cecília de Chiara Moço, Alison Tadeu Sawczuk, Patricia Soffiatti |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 14% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Hoehnea
#6
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,238
of 208,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hoehnea
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.