The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A short review of the previous and current epidemiological situation of schistosomiasis in China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2000
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0037-86821997000100011 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
L P Cen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 50% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1998.
All research outputs
#8,885,886
of 26,345,808 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#205
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,110
of 39,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,345,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.