↓ Skip to main content

The myth of aortic valve annulus changes in aortic valve disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The myth of aortic valve annulus changes in aortic valve disease
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1302992
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanren Peng, Huijun Hu, Xiaorong Shu, Yongqing Lin, Weibin Huang, Shuwan Xu, Ruqiong Nie

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,072,974
of 25,088,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,347
of 8,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,771
of 235,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#80
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,088,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,946 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.