Title |
The First Cerebral Angiograms: Imaging to Find Displacement
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neurocritical Care, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12028-023-01912-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eelco F. M. Wijdicks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 7% |
Mexico | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,277,352
of 26,094,193 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#398
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,319
of 367,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,094,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.