The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical trials of antibody drugs in the treatments of atopic dermatitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1229539 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guihao Zhou, Yueyao Huang, Ming Chu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,363,670
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,922
of 7,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,474
of 352,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#51
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.