The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Current challenges and future prospect of biomass cooking and heating stoves in Asian Countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Energy Research, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenrg.2022.880064 |
Authors |
Riaz Ahmad, Hafiza Nabila Ilyas, Bin Li, Muhammad Sultan, Muhammad Amjad, Muhammad Aleem, Adnan Abbas, Muhammad Ali Imran, Fahid Riaz |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 7 | 16% |
Energy | 4 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 21 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,629,662
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#317
of 4,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,374
of 437,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#9
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,708 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.