↓ Skip to main content

Sialyl-Tn serves as a potential therapeutic target for ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ovarian Research, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Sialyl-Tn serves as a potential therapeutic target for ovarian cancer
Published in
Journal of Ovarian Research, April 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13048-024-01397-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linah Al-Alem, Jillian M. Prendergast, Justin Clark, Bianca Zarrella, Dominique T. Zarrella, Sarah J. Hill, Whitfield B. Growdon, Venkatesh Pooladanda, David R. Spriggs, Daniel Cramer, Kevin M. Elias, Rawan I. Nazer, Steven J. Skates, Jeff Behrens, Daniel T. Dransfield, Bo R. Rueda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,016,336
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ovarian Research
#121
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,271
of 280,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ovarian Research
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.