The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Plastic vasomotion entrainment
|
---|---|
Published in |
eLife, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.7554/elife.93721 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daichi Sasaki, Ken Imai, Yoko Ikoma, Ko Matsui |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 57 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 54 | 90% |
Scientists | 4 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 27% |
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#404,483
of 26,562,579 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#1,053
of 16,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,509
of 346,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#5
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,562,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.