The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gaming with health misinformation: a social capital-based study of corrective information sharing factors in social media
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1351820 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bobo Feng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 40% |
Other | 2 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 40% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 20% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,207,564
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#10,079
of 14,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,296
of 218,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#151
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.