↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of preventive treatment among different age groups and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection status: a systematic review and individual-participant data meta-analysis of contact tracing…

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
40 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of preventive treatment among different age groups and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection status: a systematic review and individual-participant data meta-analysis of contact tracing studies
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, May 2024
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00083-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonardo Martinez, James A Seddon, C Robert Horsburgh, Christoph Lange, Anna M Mandalakas, TB Contact Studies Consortium, Leonardo Martinez, James Seddon, Qiao Liu, Carlos Acuna Villaorduna, Maryline Bonnet, Anna Cristina C. Carvalho, Pei-Chun Chan, Philip C Hill, Elisa Lopez-Varela, Simon Donkor, Stephen M. Graham, Julian A. Villalba, Louis Grandjean, Jean-Pierre Zellweger, Jann-Yuan Wang, Lilly M Verhagen, Cari van Schalkwykn, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff, Rosa Sloot, Lisa Trieu, Shama Desai Ahuja, Takashi Yoshiyama, Rufaida Mazahir, Neil A Martinsonn, Edward C. Jones-López, Neus Altet, Seiya Kato, Chi-Tai Fang, Steffen Geis, Anja Hauri, Richard Long, Claudia C Dobler, Joan A Cayla, Tsira Chakhaia, Cheng Chen, Alberto L. García-Basteiro, Rina Triasih, Li-Min Huang, Surendra Sharma, Djohar Hannoun, LaShaunda L. Malone, Du-Lin Ling, Afrânio Kritski, Catherine M. Stein, Amyn A Malik, Orvalho Augusto, Richa Vashishtha, Fadila Boulahbal, W. Henry Boom, Ye Shen, Anneke C Hesseling, C. Robert Horsburgh, Christoph Lange, Anna M. Mandalakas

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Philosophy 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#523,886
of 26,510,312 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#376
of 2,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,165
of 335,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,510,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.