Title |
Pulp stones in unerupted teeth: a retrospective analysis using cone-beam computed tomography
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Oral Health, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12903-024-04503-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hassan Hamed Kaabi, Abdullah Mahmoud Riyahi, Abdullah Khalid Bakrman, Yazeed Ali Almutaw, Saleh Firas Alrumayyan, Nassr Saleh Al-Maflehi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,211,792
of 26,214,973 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#436
of 1,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,759
of 177,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,214,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.