| Title |
Tailoring communication practices to support effective delivery of telehealth in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12875-024-02441-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah J. White, Amy D. Nguyen, Peter Roger, Tim Tse, John A. Cartmill, Sarah Hatem, Simon M. Willcock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,573,966
of 26,240,084 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#492
of 2,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,150
of 170,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,240,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.