The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inducible degradation-coupled phosphoproteomics identifies PP2ARts1 as a novel eisosome regulator
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2024.1451027 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew G. DeMarco, Marcella G. Dibble, Mark C. Hall |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,886,286
of 26,510,696 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#2,389
of 10,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,451
of 131,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#14
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,510,696 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.