The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Aetiologies of bacterial tick-borne febrile illnesses in humans in Africa: diagnostic limitations and the need for improvement
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1419575 |
Authors |
Abdulrahman Adamu, Flavia Reyer, Nafiú Lawal, Abdurrahman Jibril Hassan, Mustapha Umar Imam, Muhammad Bashir Bello, Peter Kraiczy |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,758,534
of 26,228,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,092
of 7,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,069
of 131,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#18
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,228,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.