↓ Skip to main content

Co-creating community wellbeing initiatives: what is the evidence and how do they work?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Co-creating community wellbeing initiatives: what is the evidence and how do they work?
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, August 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13033-024-00645-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Powell, Hazel Dalton, Joanne Lawrence-Bourne, David Perkins

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 86%
Researcher 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 86%
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#6,982,685
of 26,583,927 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#380
of 783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,123
of 231,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,583,927 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them