↓ Skip to main content

New Insights toward Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Using Natural Bioactive Compounds

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Insights toward Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Using Natural Bioactive Compounds
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saúl Redondo-Blanco, Javier Fernández, Ignacio Gutiérrez-del-Río, Claudio J. Villar, Felipe Lombó

Abstract

Combination therapy consists in the simultaneous administration of a conventional chemotherapy drug (or sometimes, a radiotherapy protocol) together with one or more natural bioactives (usually from plant or fungal origin) of small molecular weight. This combination of anticancer drugs may be applied to cell cultures of tumor cells, or to an animal model for a cancer type (or its xenograft), or to a clinical trial in patients. In this review, we summarize current knowledge describing diverse synergistic effects on colorectal cancer cell cultures, animal models, and clinical trials of various natural bioactives (stilbenes, flavonoids, terpenes, curcumin, and other structural families), which may be important with respect to diminish final doses of the chemotherapy drug, although maintaining its biological effect. This is important as these approaches may help reduce side effects in patients under conventional chemotherapy. Also, these molecules may exerts their synergistic effects via different cell cycle pathways, including different ones to those responsible of resistance phenotypes: transcription factors, membrane receptors, adhesion and structural molecules, cell cycle regulatory components, and apoptosis pathways.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Master 23 11%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 76 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Chemistry 8 4%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 89 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,977,231
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,450
of 18,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,270
of 312,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#35
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.