The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Academics can help shape Wikipedia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aao0462 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Shafee, Daniel Mietchen, Andrew I Su |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 14% |
| Australia | 6 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 4% |
| Italy | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 63 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 69% |
| Scientists | 22 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 29% |
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#469,822
of 26,617,554 outputs
Outputs from Science
#11,354
of 84,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,457
of 333,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#372
of 1,217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.