The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1590/s2176-94512012000600013 |
Authors |
Fernando Antonio Gonçalves, Vânia Célia Vieira de Siqueira |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 24% |
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 59% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#132
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,264
of 210,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.