The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
う蝕予防のためのフッ化物応用に関する最近の知見
|
---|---|
Published in |
ORAL THERAPEUTICS AND PHARMACOLOGY, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.11263/jsotp.29.1 |
Authors |
郡司 明彦, 田村 幸彦, 平尾 功治, 町田 光, 秋田 季子, 小林 奈緒美, 藤井 彰 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 40% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,441,516
of 26,591,670 outputs
Outputs from ORAL THERAPEUTICS AND PHARMACOLOGY
#1
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,646
of 108,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ORAL THERAPEUTICS AND PHARMACOLOGY
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,591,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them