You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Studies of Isolated Peripheral Blood Cells as a Model of Immune Dysfunction
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 12 |
Book title |
Investigations of Early Nutrition Effects on Long-Term Health
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7614-0_12 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7613-3, 978-1-4939-7614-0
|
Authors |
Hassan Rahmoune, Paul C. Guest, Rahmoune, Hassan, Guest, Paul C. |
Abstract |
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) have been used as a surrogate model of immune function in studies of multiple medical areas, such as metabolic diseases and immune dysfunction. This chapter describes a standardized technique for blood draw and preparation of PBMCs from whole blood using density gradient centrifugation, followed by cell culture. The main focus is on collection of the PBMC culture media and extraction of cellular proteins in order to provide the materials for biomarker studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 2 | 20% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,927,741
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,288
of 13,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,382
of 442,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#868
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.