The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diagnostic methods for identification of root-knot nematodes species from Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Rural, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20170449 |
Authors |
Tiago Garcia da Cunha, Liliane Evangelista Visôtto, Everaldo Antônio Lopes, Claúdio Marcelo Gonçalves Oliveira, Pedro Ivo Vieira Good God |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Researcher | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 83% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,058
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#388,666
of 447,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.