↓ Skip to main content

Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
964 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1980 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/nbt.3190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Maruyama, Stephanie K Dougan, Matthias C Truttmann, Angelina M Bilate, Jessica R Ingram, Hidde L Ploegh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,980 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 12 <1%
Unknown 1921 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 445 22%
Researcher 391 20%
Student > Bachelor 264 13%
Student > Master 241 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 86 4%
Other 244 12%
Unknown 309 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 687 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 624 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 94 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 45 2%
Chemistry 38 2%
Other 145 7%
Unknown 347 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#445,378
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#985
of 8,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,982
of 278,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#11
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.