The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1038/nbt.3190 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Takeshi Maruyama, Stephanie K Dougan, Matthias C Truttmann, Angelina M Bilate, Jessica R Ingram, Hidde L Ploegh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 15% |
Japan | 3 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 39 | 64% |
Scientists | 20 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,980 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | <1% |
Germany | 5 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
Canada | 4 | <1% |
Finland | 3 | <1% |
Japan | 3 | <1% |
Denmark | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Other | 12 | <1% |
Unknown | 1921 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 445 | 22% |
Researcher | 391 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 264 | 13% |
Student > Master | 241 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 86 | 4% |
Other | 244 | 12% |
Unknown | 309 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 687 | 35% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 624 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 45 | 2% |
Chemistry | 38 | 2% |
Other | 145 | 7% |
Unknown | 347 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#445,378
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#985
of 8,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,982
of 278,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#11
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.