Title |
Learning to Classify Organic and Conventional Wheat – A Machine Learning Driven Approach Using the MeltDB 2.0 Metabolomics Analysis Platform
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00035 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nikolas Kessler, Anja Bonte, Stefan P. Albaum, Paul Mäder, Monika Messmer, Alexander Goesmann, Karsten Niehaus, Georg Langenkämper, Tim W. Nattkemper |
Abstract |
We present results of our machine learning approach to the problem of classifying GC-MS data originating from wheat grains of different farming systems. The aim is to investigate the potential of learning algorithms to classify GC-MS data to be either from conventionally grown or from organically grown samples and considering different cultivars. The motivation of our work is rather obvious nowadays: increased demand for organic food in post-industrialized societies and the necessity to prove organic food authenticity. The background of our data set is given by up to 11 wheat cultivars that have been cultivated in both farming systems, organic and conventional, throughout 3 years. More than 300 GC-MS measurements were recorded and subsequently processed and analyzed in the MeltDB 2.0 metabolomics analysis platform, being briefly outlined in this paper. We further describe how unsupervised (t-SNE, PCA) and supervised (SVM) methods can be applied for sample visualization and classification. Our results clearly show that years have most and wheat cultivars have second-most influence on the metabolic composition of a sample. We can also show that for a given year and cultivar, organic and conventional cultivation can be distinguished by machine-learning algorithms. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 29% |
Spain | 1 | 14% |
Japan | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 7 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 14% |
Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 35% |