↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a Novel Finite Element Model of Active Contraction in the Heart

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of a Novel Finite Element Model of Active Contraction in the Heart
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00425
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoyan Zhang, Zhan-Qiu Liu, Kenneth S. Campbell, Jonathan F. Wenk

Abstract

Finite element (FE) modeling is becoming a widely used approach for the investigation of global heart function. In the present study, a novel model of cellular-level systolic contraction, which includes both length- and velocity-dependence, was implemented into a 3D non-linear FE code. To validate this new FE implementation, an optimization procedure was used to determine the contractile parameters, associated with sarcomeric function, by comparing FE-predicted pressure and strain to experimental measures collected with magnetic resonance imaging and catheterization in the ventricles of five healthy rats. The pressure-volume relationship generated by the FE models matched well with the experimental data. Additionally, the regional distribution of end-systolic strains and circumferential-longitudinal shear angle exhibited good agreement with experimental results overall, with the main deviation occurring in the septal region. Moreover, the FE model predicted a heterogeneous distribution of sarcomere re-lengthening after ventricular ejection, which is consistent with previous in vivo studies. In conclusion, the new FE active contraction model was able to predict the global performance and regional mechanical behaviors of the LV during the entire cardiac cycle. By including more accurate cellular-level mechanisms, this model could provide a better representation of the LV and enhance cardiac research related to both systolic and diastolic dysfunction.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 21 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,485,225
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,495
of 13,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,602
of 326,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#368
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.