The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical Prognostic Value of RNA Viral Load and CD4 Cell Counts during Untreated HIV-1 Infection—A Quantitative Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005950 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eline L. Korenromp, Brian G. Williams, George P. Schmid, Christopher Dye |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Zimbabwe | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 95 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
Researcher | 18 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Professor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 23% |
Unknown | 11 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 16% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,877
of 194,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,407
of 110,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#263
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.