↓ Skip to main content

Fc glycans of therapeutic antibodies as critical quality attributes

Overview of attention for article published in Glycobiology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 2,111)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 X users
patent
22 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
334 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
514 Mendeley
Title
Fc glycans of therapeutic antibodies as critical quality attributes
Published in
Glycobiology, August 2015
DOI 10.1093/glycob/cwv065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dietmar Reusch, Max L Tejada

Abstract

Critical quality attributes (CQA) are physical, chemical, biological or microbiological properties or characteristics that must be within an appropriate limit, range, or distribution to ensure the desired product quality, safety, and efficacy. For monoclonal antibody therapeutics that rely on Fc-mediated effector function for their clinical activity, the terminal sugars of Fc glycans have been shown to be critical for safety or efficacy. Different glycosylation variants have also been shown to influence the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic behavior while other Fc glycan structural elements may be involved in adverse immune reactions. This review focuses on the role of Fc glycans as CQAs. Fc glycan information from published literature is summarized and evaluated for impact on patient safety, immunogenicity, bioactivity and pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 508 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 121 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 17%
Student > Master 48 9%
Other 43 8%
Student > Bachelor 42 8%
Other 45 9%
Unknown 129 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 120 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 15%
Chemistry 43 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 39 8%
Chemical Engineering 21 4%
Other 71 14%
Unknown 145 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,356,760
of 26,549,961 outputs
Outputs from Glycobiology
#22
of 2,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,532
of 276,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Glycobiology
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,549,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.