The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,199 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: A review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology Advances, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Atanas G. Atanasov, Birgit Waltenberger, Eva-Maria Pferschy-Wenzig, Thomas Linder, Christoph Wawrosch, Pavel Uhrin, Veronika Temml, Limei Wang, Stefan Schwaiger, Elke H. Heiss, Judith M. Rollinger, Daniela Schuster, Johannes M. Breuss, Valery Bochkov, Marko D. Mihovilovic, Brigitte Kopp, Rudolf Bauer, Verena M. Dirsch, Hermann Stuppner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 729 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 184 | 2% |
| India | 157 | 2% |
| Brazil | 89 | 1% |
| Canada | 86 | 1% |
| Spain | 67 | <1% |
| Mexico | 47 | <1% |
| Australia | 44 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 41 | <1% |
| Other | 846 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5909 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7847 | 96% |
| Scientists | 176 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 90 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 80 | <1% |
| Unknown | 6 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3212 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 474 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 410 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 370 | 11% |
| Researcher | 291 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 171 | 5% |
| Other | 511 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1015 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 459 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 423 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 378 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 366 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 3% |
| Other | 368 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1161 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3730. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,485
of 26,800,077 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Advances
#1
of 1,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4
of 276,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Advances
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,800,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.