↓ Skip to main content

Interpreting melanin-based coloration through deep time: a critical review

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Interpreting melanin-based coloration through deep time: a critical review
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2015
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2015.0614
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johan Lindgren, Alison Moyer, Mary H. Schweitzer, Peter Sjövall, Per Uvdal, Dan E. Nilsson, Jimmy Heimdal, Anders Engdahl, Johan A. Gren, Bo Pagh Schultz, Benjamin P. Kear

Abstract

Colour, derived primarily from melanin and/or carotenoid pigments, is integral to many aspects of behaviour in living vertebrates, including social signalling, sexual display and crypsis. Thus, identifying biochromes in extinct animals can shed light on the acquisition and evolution of these biological traits. Both eumelanin and melanin-containing cellular organelles (melanosomes) are preserved in fossils, but recognizing traces of ancient melanin-based coloration is fraught with interpretative ambiguity, especially when observations are based on morphological evidence alone. Assigning microbodies (or, more often reported, their 'mouldic impressions') as melanosome traces without adequately excluding a bacterial origin is also problematic because microbes are pervasive and intimately involved in organismal degradation. Additionally, some forms synthesize melanin. In this review, we survey both vertebrate and microbial melanization, and explore the conflicts influencing assessment of microbodies preserved in association with ancient animal soft tissues. We discuss the types of data used to interpret fossil melanosomes and evaluate whether these are sufficient for definitive diagnosis. Finally, we outline an integrated morphological and geochemical approach for detecting endogenous pigment remains and associated microstructures in multimillion-year-old fossils.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 121 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Chemistry 7 6%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,487,757
of 26,110,873 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,636
of 11,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,931
of 279,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#63
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,110,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.