The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The neuroscience of moral cognition: from dual processes to dynamic systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Opinion in Psychology, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.009 |
| Authors |
Jay J Van Bavel, Oriel FeldmanHall, Peter Mende-Siedlecki |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 30 | 12% |
| Professor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 34 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 129 | 52% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,157,571
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Psychology
#426
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,096
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Psychology
#15
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.