↓ Skip to main content

Association of current and former smoking with body mass index: A study of smoking discordant twin pairs from 21 twin cohorts

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of current and former smoking with body mass index: A study of smoking discordant twin pairs from 21 twin cohorts
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0200140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maarit Piirtola, Aline Jelenkovic, Antti Latvala, Reijo Sund, Chika Honda, Fujio Inui, Mikio Watanabe, Rie Tomizawa, Yoshinori Iwatani, Juan R. Ordoñana, Juan F. Sánchez-Romera, Lucia Colodro-Conde, Adam D. Tarnoki, David L. Tarnoki, Nicholas G. Martin, Grant W. Montgomery, Sarah E. Medland, Finn Rasmussen, Per Tynelius, Qihua Tan, Dongfeng Zhang, Zengchang Pang, Esther Rebato, Maria A. Stazi, Corrado Fagnani, Sonia Brescianini, Andreas Busjahn, Jennifer R. Harris, Ingunn Brandt, Thomas Sevenius Nilsen, Tessa L. Cutler, John L. Hopper, Robin P. Corley, Brooke M. Huibregtse, Joohon Sung, Jina Kim, Jooyeon Lee, Sooji Lee, Margaret Gatz, David A. Butler, Carol E. Franz, William S. Kremen, Michael J. Lyons, Patrik K. E. Magnusson, Nancy L. Pedersen, Anna K. Dahl Aslan, Sevgi Y. Öncel, Fazil Aliev, Catherine A. Derom, Robert F. Vlietinck, Ruth J. F. Loos, Judy L. Silberg, Hermine H. Maes, Dorret I. Boomsma, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Tellervo Korhonen, Jaakko Kaprio, Karri Silventoinen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 73 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 79 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,789,292
of 26,239,416 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,736
of 232,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,726
of 342,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#915
of 3,238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,239,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.