↓ Skip to main content

Early detection and monitoring of chronic wounds using low-cost, omniphobic paper-based smart bandages

Overview of attention for article published in Biosensors & Bioelectronics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Early detection and monitoring of chronic wounds using low-cost, omniphobic paper-based smart bandages
Published in
Biosensors & Bioelectronics, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.bios.2018.06.060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aniket Pal, Debkalpa Goswami, Hugo E. Cuellar, Beatriz Castro, Shihuan Kuang, Ramses V. Martinez

Abstract

The growing socio-economic burden of chronic skin wounds requires the development of new automated and non-invasive analytical systems capable of wirelessly monitoring wound status. This work describes the low-cost fabrication of single-use, omniphobic paper-based smart bandages (OPSBs) designed to monitor the status of open chronic wounds and to detect the formation of pressure ulcers. OPSBs are lightweight, flexible, breathable, easy to apply, and disposable by burning. A reusable wearable potentiostat was fabricated to interface with the OPSB simply by attaching it to the back of the bandage. The wearable potentiostat and the OPSB can be used to simultaneously quantify pH and uric acid levels at the wound site, and wirelessly report wound status to the user or medical personnel. Additionally, the wearable potentiostat and the OPSBs can be used to detect, in an in-vivo mouse model, the formation of pressure ulcers even before the pressure-induced tissue damage becomes visible, using impedance spectroscopy. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using inexpensive single-use OPSBs and a reusable, wearable potentiostat that can be easily sterilized and attached to a new OPSB during the dressing change, to provide long term wound progression data to guide treatment decisions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 219 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Professor 10 5%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 63 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 52 24%
Chemistry 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Chemical Engineering 7 3%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 80 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,805,931
of 26,493,631 outputs
Outputs from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#848
of 7,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,393
of 344,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#12
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,493,631 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.