The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, October 2005
|
DOI | 10.1038/nature04067 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
W. H. Bakun, B. Aagaard, B. Dost, W. L. Ellsworth, J. L. Hardebeck, R. A. Harris, C. Ji, M. J. S. Johnston, J. Langbein, J. J. Lienkaemper, A. J. Michael, J. R. Murray, R. M. Nadeau, P. A. Reasenberg, M. S. Reichle, E. A. Roeloffs, A. Shakal, R. W. Simpson, F. Waldhauser |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 233 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 26% |
Researcher | 46 | 19% |
Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 7% |
Other | 41 | 17% |
Unknown | 23 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 150 | 62% |
Engineering | 19 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 4% |
Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 9% |
Unknown | 34 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,311,763
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#62,624
of 92,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,292
of 59,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#267
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.