↓ Skip to main content

Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Alcoholism and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Alcoholism and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominic T. Cheng, Sandra W. Jacobson, Joseph L. Jacobson, Christopher D. Molteno, Mark E. Stanton, John E. Desmond

Abstract

Alcoholism is a debilitating disorder that can take a significant toll on health and professional and personal relationships. Excessive alcohol consumption can have a serious impact on both drinkers and developing fetuses, leading to long-term learning impairments. Decades of research in laboratory animals and humans have demonstrated the value of eyeblink classical conditioning (EBC) as a well-characterized model system to study the neural mechanisms underlying associative learning. Behavioral EBC studies in adults with alcohol use disorders and in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders report a clear learning deficit in these two patient populations, suggesting alcohol-related damage to the cerebellum and associated structures. Insight into the neural mechanisms underlying these learning impairments has largely stemmed from laboratory animal studies. In this mini-review, we present and discuss exemplary animal findings and data from patient and neuroimaging studies. An improved understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying learning deficits in EBC related to alcoholism and prenatal alcohol exposure has the potential to advance the diagnoses, treatment, and prevention of these and other pediatric and adult disorders.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Neuroscience 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,829
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,846
of 9,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,080
of 285,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#32
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.